Featured: Adventures in Chaos| Nearly Wed| No-Obligation Book Club
Categories: Food & Recipes| Home & Organizing| Beauty & Fashion| Holidays & Entertaining| Health| Work & Life| Technology



Can We Afford to Stay in the City?
Posted on Oct 8, 2006 1:57:23 PM  |  By SimplyStatedAdmin

Jennifer Hertsenberg
age 34 | part-time fitness instructor, married with two children | San Francisco

The big decision I'm currently wrestling with is... Can we afford to stay in San Francisco? My husband and I sometimes think about moving to Southern California because San Francisco is so expensive. We probably won’t be able to afford a decent home for a family of four in this city without having to work four jobs. To buy anything close to what we have now, we’d have to move to the suburbs, and we don’t want to do that.

Paul and I both grew up in the suburbs in the Midwest, but we love the buzz of city living. Right now we rent an affordable two-bedroom apartment in a wonderful neighborhood that’s close to my work and within walking distance of the beach, the park, restaurants, and the grocery store. We have access to museums, cultural and music festivals, theaters, and shopping. We rarely drive our car except to make big grocery-shopping trips and to visit our friends outside the city. Between my husband’s income and mine, we have a comfortable but not extravagant lifestyle in San Francisco and we’re happy. But I still wonder if we should make a move.


Offer your adivce or share your experience with Jennifer by posting a comment.



Digg This! | Stumble It! | Add to KiRTSY | Save to del.icio.us | Email this post



Post Your Comment:
Terms of Service

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.
















Dear Jennifer, I moved from Southern California to the SF Bay Area in 2006 after commuting on weekends for three years between LA-SF. My boyfriend lives here and he's a single Dad with 3 children in school so him moving to LA wasn't an option. I'm not from the USA so I will be honest...STAY WHERE YOU ARE. I enjoyed my job in LA and weather is nice but the two big problems are that it lacks a soul....and commuting is a nightmare. If you've been living in the city then you're used to the great public transport, in LA it's non-existent. LA is not like Chicago or New York or San Francisco. I had friends down there who regularly spent 2 hours each day (each way) in traffic. I now live 45 miles east of SF and it takes me 30 minutes door to door on the train. Think seriously about the move, it's a HUGE difference in lifestyle.

Posted by: Barbara| September 17, 2007 at 05:41 PM




Jennifer, my husband and I bought our first house in Southern California when we were both struggling financially, but ti was the best investment we ever made. We were farther out of the area were we had lived and could walk to everything we desired, but it was an investment is US, our family and future. Later we had the opportunity to relocate to North Carolina, and our lifestyle here is more of what I always dreamed my California life would be: we live in an affordable community with great schools, people from all over the world, and can walk to shops, restaurants and theatre. All without the fear of the next earthquake! I guess what I am trying to say is home is where you make it, and many other places outside of where you are now may suit your needs; you just have to explore what is out there. Best of luck to you!

Posted by: deirdre, Chapel Hill, NC| August 30, 2007 at 01:20 PM




Jennifer--You seem pretty upbeat and positive! There is a lot of hype right now about "The Secret". Some good, some bad. I am a firm believer (with the help of The Secret") that you can do whatever you want to do. Staying in the city, loving your life and family and knowing that your possibilities are endless is your best bet--in my opinion. lAso, have a plan B--everyone needs one these days! I'm a lot more financially secure now that I've found mine! I'd be happy to share more...
jonesgirl04@yahoo.com

Posted by: N Jones, New York| June 17, 2007 at 09:05 PM




Can you afford to not be in the city? You said that you're happy and comfortable. If you moved to the suburbs, you'd likely be bored and lonely. Think of all the things you and your children would miss out on. In addition, you'd spend precious family time commuting and running errands always in the car. Is that really worth a little extra space and a lawn? I have friends who wrestle with the suburb vs city question, but for us, it's no question and never will be. Or, you might consider another city that would give you the advantages you like about San Fran but would be less expensive?

Posted by: Melanie Watson, Philadelphia| January 27, 2007 at 01:31 PM




We just moved from Chicago to a nice suburb about an hour away. We always said that we'd move someday, and while the kids are fine, we are the ones missing Chicago! I loved having the babies in the city--there was always so much to do in walking distance, etc., and the babies loved the buggy and walks. But we started looking and found the perfect house in a great suburb with great schools. It's the perfect fit for our size, and while we really miss living in the city, we'll be settled and part of the community by the time the kids get to school. (Right now they are 3 1/2 and almost 2). Enjoy the city and your lifestyle now!

Posted by: Arwen Lynch| December 01, 2006 at 07:33 PM




You didn't indicate the gender of your children. If they are different, you will have to move eventually. Also, paying rent is like pouring money down the drain. If you want to live in a city then researching other areas is the option you should take. Good luck with your decision.

Posted by: Amy Enlow| December 01, 2006 at 02:20 PM




After moving over 20 times in my young adulthood and living all over the country I would like to encourage Jennifer to stay where she is. It has been my experience that Location, Location, Location does have some merit. Having exposure to diversity and culture is no trade off for a larger home or a bit more money left over at the end of the month. Even though money is tight, the reality of the city, and its opportunities for the kids and family as a whole, far outweighs the financial comfort. In my opinion I would stay. After all Money will always be money, but the experiences of San Francisco are priceless.

Posted by: Lisa| October 08, 2006 at 02:03 PM




Jennifer, reading your article, I felt as if you were telling my story. We are the same age, have a boy 2 years old and a girl just over a year. I live in a two bedroom home and always am thinking about moving. Right now we live in a midwest town with all of our family with in 10 miles of us. Work is only a few miles away. With all that said, I would love a bigger house (so the kids could have their own rooms) and yard (so the three labs could run free). When looking around our area, in order for us to have that we would have to move over 30 miles away to afford my dream. I love living close to work and family. I'm not sure I would be happy driving 45 min both ways to work and to see the family. Is my dream home more important to me than my family time. Right now I don't think I would want to spend that time in the car and not playing as much with my kids. So think about what's most important to you. Your space you live in or what you do in that space and your surroundings.

Posted by: Teresa| October 08, 2006 at 02:03 PM






Subscribe

Enter your email address to get updates:

Get the RSS feed
Subscribe by Category


Previously on Simply Stated


Advertisement




Search Simply Stated




Contributors

Archives

Advertisement

Sites We Like


Featured in Alltop